avdevice/timefilter-test: dont try to optimize par1 for n0=0 case

for the n0=0 case there are multiple solutions and different
platforms pick different ones
This should reduce the issues with fate and the timefilter test

Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
This commit is contained in:
Michael Niedermayer 2013-08-02 16:59:03 +02:00
parent 61a28d00e8
commit 2b9590ebab
2 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -118,7 +118,8 @@ int main(void)
double par0, par1;
better = 0;
for (par0 = bestpar0 * 0.8; par0 <= bestpar0 * 1.21; par0 += bestpar0 * 0.05) {
for (par1 = bestpar1 * 0.8; par1 <= bestpar1 * 1.21; par1 += bestpar1 * 0.05) {
double range = n0 ? 0.8 : 1.0;
for (par1 = bestpar1 * range; par1 <= bestpar1 * (2.01 - range); par1 += bestpar1 * 0.05) {
double error = 0;
TimeFilter *tf = ff_timefilter_new(1, par0, par1);
for (i = 0; i < SAMPLES; i++) {

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
[ 0.800000 0.800000 0.000000] [ 0.800000 2758.779681 0.000000] [ 0.800000 3881.880055 0.000000] [ 0.800000 5213.913473 0.000000]
[ 0.800000 1.000000 0.000000] [1689.810931 1.000000 0.000000] [2480.175715 1.000000 0.000000] [3323.672664 1.000000 0.000000]
[1688.672234 0.000000 0.018551] [ 21.026792 0.000401 0.068856] [ 1.162481 0.008576 0.121287] [ 0.803356 0.016078 0.153518]
[1218.378235 0.000000 0.167011] [ 12.908626 0.000281 0.296858] [ 21.026792 0.000401 0.619608] [ 2.064064 0.004760 1.020336]
[1218.378235 0.000000 0.909282] [ 10.047626 0.000191 0.873495] [ 14.909464 0.000297 1.935407] [ 21.026792 0.000401 3.373312]