This makes the difference between passing VA_FRAME_PICTURE or
VA_BOTTOM_FIELD for progressive frames (that should be force-
deinterlaced) to VAProcPipelineParameterBuffer.flags. VA-VPP doesn't
really seem to care, and we can get rid of mp_refqueue_is_interlaced()
entirely. It could be argued it's better to pass field flags instead of
the progressive flag.
Main use: deinterlacing.
I'm not sure how to select the deinterlacing mode at all. You can
enumate the available video processors, but at least on Intel, all of
them either signal support for all deinterlacers, or none (the latter is
apparently used for IVTC). I haven't found anything that actually tells
the processor _which_ algorithm to use.
Another strange detail is how to select top/bottom fields and field
dominance. At least I'm getting quite similar results to vavpp on Linux,
so I'm content with it for now.
Future plans include removing the D3D11 video processor use from the
ANGLE interop code.
This makes vf_vdpaupp use the deinterlacer helper code already used by
vf_vavpp. I nice side-effect is that this also removes some traces of
code originating from vo_vdpau.c, so we can switch it to LGPL.
Extend the refqueue helper with a deint setting. If not set,
mp_refqueue_should_deint() always returns false, which slightly
simplifies vf_vdpaupp. It's of no consequence to vf_vavpp (other than it
has to set it to get expected behavior).
Abstracts the annoying framerate-doubling behavior.
Same deal as with refqueue introduction: the code size blows up, but at
least it can be reused for other filters.
Move the handling of the future/past frames and the associated dataflow
rules to a separate source file.
While this on its own seems rather questionable and just inflates the
code, I intend to reuse it for other filters. The logic is annoying
enough that it shouldn't be duplicated a bunch of times.
(I considered other ways of sharing this logic, such as an uber-
deinterlace filter, which would access the hardware deinterlacer via a
different API. Although that sounds like kind of the right approach,
this would have other problems, so let's not, at least for now.)
